The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Former Officers Association (PBPSPRM) has described the issue of public officials owning shares as an administrative matter, not a white-collar crime.
Clarification on nature of the controversy
Commenting on the ongoing debate involving MACC chief commissioner Azam Baki, the association said the matter relates to asset declaration requirements and shareholding limits set out in Civil Service Guidelines.
In a statement today, PBPSPRM pointed out that public officials submit asset declarations to their top superiors, and these are not meant for public disclosure.
Azam has already stated that his holdings were declared through proper government channels and have since been sold off.
The association said it is therefore right to await the outcome of the investigation panel that has been set up.
No evidence of wrongdoing found
To date, PBPSPRM noted, there is no indication that Azam abused his power, interfered in any investigations, or gained personal profit through his official role.
It stressed the need to clearly separate a possible procedural lapse from actual corruption or white-collar crime.
Doing so helps avoid being swayed by mistaken perceptions or hasty conclusions.
The association described the current situation as a case of perceived conflict rather than an actual one.
Call for measured response
“Perception is important, but it cannot replace evidence when judging individuals and institutions,” it said.
PBPSPRM expressed worry that prolonged heated debate could damage the country’s credibility, especially when it involves a vital body like the MACC.
It called for a mature approach by backing the independent investigation and respecting the process under existing laws and regulations.
“We must avoid jumping to early conclusions,” the association added.
